Kenya’s Tana River Delta under Threat

It is home to globally threatened birds and two threatened primates, as well as lions, hippos and elephants.

Image: By SGT R.A. Ward, U.S. Marine Corps (http://www.dodmedia.osd.mil; VIRIN: DM-SD-01-06042) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

The Tana River Delta in Kenya is one of the most important wetland areas in Africa. Covering an area of 130,000 hectares (320,000 acres), it is often described as Africa’s second Okavango Delta. It is widely regarded to be of international importance for wildlife, but is now threatened with development that will destroy biodiversity and the livelihoods of many thousands of people.

Mosaic of habitats

The Delta is a vast area of a mosaic of habitats such as palm savannah, woodland, lakes, mangroves, sand dunes, coral reefs and the Tana River itself. Unsurprisingly, the variety of wildlife the Delta supports is immense. There are over 350 species of birds, of which 22 wetland species (such as pelicans, storks and egrets) occur in internationally important numbers. It is home to globally threatened birds and two threatened primates, as well as lions, hippos and elephants.

Challenge from conservation groups

This diversity is the reason why conservation groups are desperate to stop plans for large-scale developments in the area. Several schemes for growing food crops and bio-fuels have been put forward since the Delta was highlighted in Kenya’s national development plan as an area for agricultural expansion. Huge sugar cane plantations, mining in the sand dunes and prospecting for oil and gas are all being proposed, as is growing maize and rice, even though previous attempts to do this have failed. Possibly the most controversial proposal is a plan to grow the bio-fuel Jatropha, a crop that has been proven to release more greenhouse gas into the atmosphere than will be saved by using it instead of fossil fuels, by a joint RSPB, Nature Kenya and Action Aid study.

As well as a threat to wildlife, these plans threaten the survival of 90,000 people living in the area. The Delta is one of the poorest regions of Kenya, with 73% of people living below the poverty line. The Tana River provides food, fresh water and fuel, but if the plans go ahead, over 110,000 hectares (270,000 acres) will be converted into plantations, and local people will lose their land. Already villages have been issued with eviction notices.

After considering the environmental impact assessments, Kenya’s National Environmental Management Authority has approved these projects. Clearly conservation organisations have a fight on their hands to protect the incredible biodiversity and local people of the Tana River Delta. To help protect the Delta, sign the petition here.

Tags:

2 Comments

  • Good environment a better future, and a poor environment……………

    Stephen Kariuki 4th October 2013 at 10:15 am Reply
  • The Tana delta is community diverse with a number of different ecosystems yet its been neglected.

    Bahola Buya 8th July 2020 at 10:19 am Reply
Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.*

Tick the box or answer the captcha.

You might also like

  • Large Freshwater Animals in Decline

    A study of large freshwater animals between 1970 to 2012 has revealed that populations throughout the globe have fallen by 88%, with large fish species being particularly affected. Conservation action for freshwater biodiversity is urgently required.

    By Alex Taylor
  • Limiting Climate Change Means Greater Survival

    The first study to explore how limiting climate change to a 1.5oC rise in temperature would benefit species throughout the world has found that the vast majority would survive, especially insects.

    By Alex Taylor
  • Population 7 Billion

    It amazed me how little mention there was of the impact population growth has on the species we share the planet with.

    By Alex Taylor
  • The Cost of De-Extinction

    A new study has found that de-extinction could actually lead to biodiversity loss rather than gain. Money spent on de-extinction would divert resources away from conservation programmes aimed at preventing the extinction of endangered animals.

    By Alex Taylor