Saving Slow-Breeding Giants
A new study suggests that short-term trends in population size and distribution may not be the best way to judge a species extinction risk, if that species is a large, slow-breeding animal. Conservation decisions based on these trends may fail to protect them.
Conservation decisions based on population counts may fail to protect large, slow-breeding animals from irrevocable decline, according to new research.
“Critical thresholds in so-called vital rates, such as mortality and fertility rates among males and females of various ages, can signal an approaching population collapse long before numbers drop below a point of no return,” says lead author Dr. Shermin de Silva, President & Founder of Asian elephant conservation charity Trunks & Leaves. “We propose that conservation efforts for Asian elephants and other slow-breeding megafauna be aimed at maintaining their ‘demographic safe space’: that is, the combination of key vital rates that supports a non-negative growth rate.”
Published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, the study suggests that a combination of key vital rates governing population growth is a better indicator of a species’ viability than short-term trends in population size and distribution.
“History bears this out,” argues de Silva. “Genomic studies of the last mammoths isolated on Wrangel Island, between Russia and Alaska, have shown that although they were able to persist for thousands of years beyond the extinction of mainland populations with just [circa] 300 individuals, they had accumulated numerous genetic mutations that may have eventually contributed to their extinction.”
In other words populations of megafauna can become biologically inviable long before they disappear, if pushed beyond their ‘demographic safe space.’
The group applied the ‘demographic safe space’ concept to the case of the Asian elephant.
“Asian elephants are classified as ‘Endangered’ under the IUCN Red List because populations are thought to have declined by at least 50% in less than a century,” explains de Silva. “There are fewer than 50,000 wild Asian elephants living today.”
Studies show that wild Asian elephants breed extremely slowly, the majority producing just one calf in six years or more. Using mathematical modelling, de Silva and colleagues found that near-optimal reproduction and high calf survival is necessary to maintain non-negative population growth in the face of even modestly increased mortality among adult female age classes. The approach shows a clear conservation priority for Asian elephants, a species in which the vast majority is tuskless.
“Measures to enhance survival of calves, and particularly females, are key to saving the Asian elephant,” emphasises de Silva. “But while the attention of the world has been focused on the ivory trade, for critically endangered Asian elephant populations the greatest threat is habitat loss – followed by illegal trade in live animals and parts. Habitat loss can create something known as ‘extinction debt’ by slowing down birth rates and increasing mortality rates. For slow breeding long-lived species, even incremental changes make a big difference, but their longevity can obscure the risk of extinction.”
Conservation efforts for other large, slow-breeding species, such as giraffes, rhinos, Bactrian camels and eastern gorillas, could also benefit from modelling the interaction between vital rates. Data for these species in the wild are a scarce yet urgent necessity.
“Rather than rely on simple population counts or estimates of near-term extinction probability, we urge that conservation resources for slow-breeding megafauna also be invested in identifying demographic tipping points and how to maintain populations within their safe spaces. Populations of slow-breeding taxa need proactive management well before numbers become critically low, when returns on investment are potentially greater and populations less likely committed to extinction,” concludes de Silva.