Biding Time Could Improve Conservation

An innovative new study has challenged the current orthodoxy in conservation by suggesting that delays in the spending of funds could actually improve the benefits gained from the money and therefore protect more species.

Blue and Yellow Macaw Image: By Rodrigo Soldon from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Arara-de-barriga-amarela) [CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Strategic delays in conservation efforts could be the key to protecting more species, according to researchers from the University of Queensland. A new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that, instead of spending project funds immediately, conservation organisations could use the right amount of delay to improve the benefits achieved from their funding. They could do this by focusing first on investment, capacity building, or monitoring and research.

Dr Gwen Iacona, a University of Queensland School of Biological Sciences and ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions Postdoctoral Research Fellow led the study. She used a mathematical model to look at conservation gains through identifying efficiencies.

“It showed that, because of the different rates of change in economic and ecological systems, waiting and using the time to improve the conservation capacity of the organisation provided better conservation outcomes than simply spending available money immediately,” she said.

The team tested this idea using data on forest restoration to counteract bird extinctions in Australia and Paraguay. “We found that in both cases more species could be protected and extinctions could be halted faster when the available money for restoration was leveraged by investing it, before spending it on the on-the-ground projects. This result opens up a new dimension in conservation planning because it demonstrates that conservation gains can be obtained by looking for efficiencies in time and not just in space as has been the traditional strategy,” Dr Iacona explains.

Every year, more species are being driven to extinction by combined pressures which include habitat destruction, invasive species and climate change. These ongoing losses have created a crisis culture in conservation, which has meant that project funds are generally spent as soon as they are received.

But this new and interesting research challenges this orthodox practice and demonstrates how strategically delaying the spending of funds could actually improve efficiency. “Waiting can allow agencies to leverage additional benefits from their funds through investment, capacity building, or monitoring and research,” she said. With the right amount of delay, limited conservation resources can protect more species and surprisingly they can even do so in less time. Our results suggest that, in addition to their current focus on where to target resources, conservation managers should carefully choose when to spend these funds.”

Tags:

No comments yet.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.*

Tick the box or answer the captcha.

You might also like

  • Manatees Facing a Safe Future

    A new report has concluded that Florida’s manatees are likely to persist for the next 100 years despite facing continued threats, providing that wildlife managers continue to protect these iconic mammals and their habitat.

    By Alex Taylor
  • Bycatch Responsible for Decline of Sea Lion

    Scientists studying the decline of the New Zealand sea lion have linked it to commercial fisheries bycatch around their breeding colonies on the Auckland Islands, which has previously been assumed to be only a minor threat.

    By Alex Taylor
  • Renewed Fears of Tiger Extinction

    A research expedition to Sumatra has found that well-protected forests on the island are disappearing and becoming increasingly fragmented, leading to renewed fears of the extinction of the Sumatran tiger.

    By Alex Taylor